Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 2001 - 2020 of 6,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” It wasn’t until 1938 that the Court, in a footnote to a case, United States v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm by Dan Rodriguez
  They are the faces of the profound access to justice crisis in the United States, putting them at omnipresent risk of losing their livelihoods, their homes, or even worse fates. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:28 pm by Peter Margulies
For example, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm by Matthew Davie
These are Department for Education v Information Commissioner & Whitmey [2018] UKUT 348 and Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner & Webber [2018] UKUT 410. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Michael Smith
The issuance or sale of securities is subject to regulation by the United States Securities Exchange Commission and by authorities in every state, including the Securities Division of the Office of the Indiana Secretary of State. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Welty
The Fourth Circuit considered the intersection of open carry and Terry in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It stated that, even if most people in Lithuania had been offended, as argued by the Lithuanian Government, a minority’s rights under the Convention could not be dependent on those rights being accepted by the majority [82]. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
 The United States filed its opposition on June 5, 2015. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:42 am
  The predecessor insurance companies to the plaintiff, Arrowood Indemnity Company, brought a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut claiming that they did not have a duty to defend or to indemnify the defendants, Pendleton King, Daphne King and their minor child, Pendleton King, Jr. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:16 pm by John Floyd
Just as in the December 2000 decision by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]