Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 2001 - 2020 of 22,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2023, 4:29 pm by David Greene
But other courts, and some state laws, believe the First Amendment only requires that an objectively reasonable person would perceive the statement to be a threat of violence.The Supreme Court is considering a case called Counterman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
Those harms to which the state plaintiffs pointed in Dep't of Commerce--"diminishment of political representation, loss of federal funds, degradation of census data, and diversion of resources" away from Democratic-leaning political units and towards Republican-leaning ones--were the reason for the citizenship question. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Ryan Merkley
In the United States, the fair use doctrine allows the exploitation of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:53 pm by Suhre & Associates
Sitz In 1990, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Michigan v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:18 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States, 575 U.S. 723 (2015), but ultimately decided the case before reaching the constitutional issue. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
United States, which held Congress cannot “commandeer” state legislatures, and Printz v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Rebecca Zietlow
According to Rebeiro, Douglass adopted a broad vision of citizenship rights to support his argument that Black people were part of “the People” protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]