Search for: "United States v. State of Louisiana"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 2,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
The plaintiff also advanced Arkansas state pharmacy regulations, but none of these created any duty of pharmacists to warn either patients or prescribing physicians. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
The United States Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Louisiana in the case of Barbour v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Larry, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Case No. 08-30368, February 8, 2011 [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
V. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:43 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court made clear in Everett v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:01 am
Brief for the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:00 pm
Texas, the United States Supreme Court held a statute criminalizing sodomy violated due process as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm
The Smith v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
Castillo then asked the Court of Appeal, which looked at cases from the United States Supreme Court (Williams v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 2:15 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution....... [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
One addresses the issue of "pay-to-delay" patent settlements, which are currently the subject of both controversy and litigation in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
