Search for: "United States v. Texas"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 8,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 9:37 am
The vessel owner notified LSM that the ship would be docking in Texas to discharge pipes, which had been loaded by a third party outside the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:18 am
In Texas, as in the rest of the United States, defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
Under Texas state law, "there is a rebuttable presumption that the defendant . . . manufacturer . . . [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
Friday 18 November United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
The case is Texas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 1:02 pm
For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Martinez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Here is what Justice Ginsburg wrote: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
Louis Brandeis famously observed that, in the United States’ system of government, the states are the laboratories of experimentation. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 6:47 am
Andrew litigates injury claims in Canada and the United States, and is licensed to practice law in Michigan, Florida, Texas and Ontario. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
"Just as foreigners should respect the letter of the law in this country, the United States should abide by its treaty obligations - not just at the federal level, but in state and local jurisdictions as well. [read post]
26 May 2008, 3:43 am
" The United States Constitution similarly requires that, "[i]n Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Mineral Royalties; State Intervention) Alturas Indian Rancheria v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 11:19 am
United Servs. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
The same provision of DOMA, of course, was later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:58 pm
V. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
