Search for: "Washington v. Downes"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 5,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court in 1869, ruled that Texas did NOT have a right to secede, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:36 am
Washington Township. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:45 am
Charlotte Butash provided a preview of the en banc oral arguments in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:13 pm
FlynnThree years ago, when sworn into the SCOTUS Bar in Washington, D.C., I was lucky enough to get a seat toward the front of the Court's chamber to observe the nine Justices, all still on the court today, up-close and personal. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Timothy Edgar discussed how judges should follow the technical approach laid out in Van Buren v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:47 am
Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:02 am
Despite all the talk of stasis and crisis in Washington, Congress is still passing modestly useful legislation on cyber issues. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:21 am
Sundara Rajan on the Washington Redskins' is-it-offensive-or-not trade mark saga. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm
This change in administration could result in better relations between the Maldives and the West, reports the Washington Post. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:00 am
Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:19 am
Robart, the federal judge presiding over the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm
Despite all the talk of stasis and crisis in Washington, Congress is still passing modestly useful legislation on cyber issues. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am
In Washington v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
The issue in Nebraska Public Power v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 3:48 am
” And in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that neither Ginsburg “— the court’s oldest member, and so the one most often in the will-she-go spotlight — nor anyone else is preparing to step down soon. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:16 pm
McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 1:35 pm
Attorney General v. [read post]
