Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 2001 - 2020 of 4,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The final matters of concern involved water supply and water quality. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am by Patricia Salkin
Wooster v Queen City Landing, LLC 2017 WL 1822611 (NYAD 4 Dept. 5/5/017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:16 pm
Two recent opinions illustrate the problems that America's mobility poses states and localities in raising tax revenue.In Antzis v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:27 am by Lyle Denniston
For the second time in recent years, the Supreme Court has turned to the federal government for advice on whether lawsuits should be allowed to go forward to fix legal blame for the deaths, injuries and property damage done by the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:13 pm
 There's the right to use navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:49 am
Teaver's work took him over water but he was not employed on a maritime vessel. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:46 am
Among the other officers who responded . . . was Drug Task Force member Brian Watson, Methamphetamine Suppression Unit Detective Brock Hensley. and Methamphetamine Suppression Unit Detective Patrick McDonald. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all of Slusher's claims. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Kelly Goles
In the U.S., the report highlights the recent Supreme Court of the United States decision, West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 8:19 am
Oregon, which concerned the rights under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of foreign nationals arrested in the United States. [read post]
12 May 2014, 1:38 pm by INFORRM
The Advocate General stated that ‘an economic operator must be considered a single unit…[and] not be dissected on the basis of its individual activities related to processing of personal data’. [read post]