Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2018, 3:16 am by Peter Mahler
Actually, we don’t have to imagine the scenario because that’s what happened in Casilli v Natan, 2018 NY Slip Op 32621(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 12, 2018], recently decided by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:12 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
In other words, you must own a stock before the ex-dividend date to receive its next dividend. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  The most trenchant of them was offered by Judge David Sentelle in  United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Canada On 18 March 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted leave to the plaintiffs to amend their pleadings to clarify the words that they allege are defamatory in the case of Thmbran v The British Columbia Co [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
” Though many other definitions of the word exist, in light of the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in AT&T v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 3:46 am by SHG
This point is driven home in People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
Yet, if courts follow the logic that underlies the Supreme Court’s decision in Opitz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
” The judge’s admonition in Redel v Redel, 2015 NY Slip Op 31941(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 16, 2015], springs from a suit against the plaintiff’s father and two sisters concerning a general partnership formed by the four of them over 30 years ago to acquire and hold a 10% interest in a limited partnership known as 225 Broadway Co. which owns an office building in lower Manhattan. [read post]