Search for: "v. " Results 2001 - 2020 of 493,715
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of his prosecution for cross burning in Virginia v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
And then the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 3:45 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Rosie Nance
However, Article 6(1)(f) GDPR sets out a three-part test which requires, firstly, the controller’s purpose to be a legitimate interest, secondly, the processing to be necessary for that purpose, and lastly, for those interests not to be overridden by data subjects’ fundamental rights and freedoms (discussed in Meta Platforms Inc. and others v Bundeskartellamt ECLI:EU:C:2023:537 Case C‑252/21, as well as e.g. the Information Commissioner’s Office’s (ICO’s)… [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 3:34 am
 Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Baker, Arnold and Nugee) Lifestyle Equities CV and others v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd and others  [2024] EWCA Civ 814 (22 July 2024)This was the claimants' appeal against Mr Justice Mellor's order in Lifestyle Equities CV and Anotherr v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd and others (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 1839 (Ch) (19 [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:40 pm by Patent Docs
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs in Ryan LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On this basis, it does not seem to me that a serious harm test would fail the rationality standard of review set out by Finlay CJ in Tuohy v Courtney (above). [read post]