Search for: "v. JONES" Results 2001 - 2020 of 9,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Staci Zaretsky
The latest chapter in the Sarah Jones v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in Abraham House of God and Cemetery, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 7:29 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
In this week’s episode, co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney discuss and debate: The array of firings and appointments of senior Defense Department officials The law governing the General Services Administration and support for presidential transitions Whether it is appropriate to place pressure on Jones Day (and their other clients) based on the involvement of Jones Day lawyers in election-challenge lawsuits United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Only yesterday the IPKat finally sorted out the awesome decision in Imerman v Tchenguiz (here), and now he's catching up on Robert Andrew Jones v Ricoh UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 1743 (Ch), a Chancery Division for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Roth midway through last month.Right: Ricoh's legal team -- or "relevant persons"? [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 9:59 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 24291 (SD NY, Feb. 13, 2018), a New York federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with claims for injunctive relief alleging that he did not receive Halal meals.In Jones v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm by Injury at Sea
Coast Guard and Washington Dept. of Ecology personnel responded to pollution caused after a vessel hit a rock near Jones Island, Monday evening. [read post]
It’s known as Subchapter V, and it allows business owners to restructure their business without any say from creditors like the Sandy Hook families. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm by Anna Christensen
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
The judge [Mark Somers] then ordered the trial....I think requiring anything other than a modest, content-neutral permit fee would be unconstitutional, as the Court held in Forsyth County v. [read post]