Search for: "AT&T" Results 2021 - 2040 of 881,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2007, 4:07 pm
REPORTERS: Don't trust news reports! [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm by Daily Record Staff
The post Vince Apruzzese | AT&T first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Nico Cordes
Bei Verwendung der Emulsion des Beispiels 1 wurde hierdurch ein Joghurt mit einer Farbintensität b von 32 erhalten, während bei Verwendung der Vergleichsemulsion nur eine Intensität b von 29 erreicht wurde. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:23 am by Cyrus Farivar
In other words, the Department of Justice isn’t saying no, and that tacit approval represents the first major hurdle that T-Mobile has to clear in order to fully acquire MetroPCS. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the patent in amended form.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board (identical to claim 1 as granted) read:Method for the immunochemical quantification of inactivated immunoreactive haemagglutinin molecule complexes of influenza viruses, which method comprises the following steps: a) a sample which contains one or more haemagglutinin molecule complexes to be determined, which complexes have… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
I find this case interesting because of the way in which Article 12(4) RPBA was invoked. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision is a good reminder of the provisions governing authorisations.The European patent under consideration was refused by a decision of the Examining Division (ED). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:05 pm by Armand Grinstajn
We have already studied several passages of this decision. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Now that the Boards are not competent for dealing with protests under the PCT any more, the question of unity of invention has become rare in the case law of the Boards of appeal. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present appeal deals with a refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED). [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 1:31 am
All of which means that if a Democrat is not elected President in 2008 (leading to a repeal), the military itself will likely decide when don't ask don't tell will be replaced by signaling that it has no interest in maintaining the policy any longer.Don't ask don't tell is a good example for analyzing how constitutional law changes. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:40 pm
And Stephen Benjamin has an op-ed entitled "Don't Ask, Don't Translate. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Any comment in the annex to the OPs summons concerned a differently worded claim.[1.7] The appellant’s contention that the space requirement feature had been an essential part of the whole “machine room-less” concept in the other family members is not found to be convincing in relation to admissibility of the various requests in appeal proceedings, since by the amendments made in the main request and the first and second auxiliary requests, the space requirement feature has been… [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:56 am by Editor Charlie
But for music creators, Google’s charm offensive in Nashville is all a sideshow, a corporate feel good effort designed to yank our gaze away from the basic facts – Google is putting all its power and might into killing legal reforms artists and songwriters need to survive. via T Bone Burnett on Google’s Nashville Charm Offensive Coming Soon to a City Near You — Artist Rights Watch [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:02 am by Bexis
They do the can-can in Paris - but Suzanne Parisian can't - can't testify as an expert in the Trasylol MDL. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:00 pm by ADR Times
District Court Says Consumer Can’t Be Forced into AT&T Arbitration San Francisco Chronicle May 25, 2011 In light of the AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
T 80/85 [3]; T 98/94 [2.3]; T 673/94 of [3]; T 448/93 [2.2]). [32] It is well-known that the European practice and case law concerning disclaimers in general was put into question by the decision T 323/97 which considered that all disclaimers have to strictly comply with the prohibition of adding subject-matter contained in A 123(2) EPC. [read post]