Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 6:34 am
More secret justice on the horizon Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:08 am
Jump forward 15 years, and you find the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
V. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 1574 (21 December 2011) Padden v Bevan Ashford Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 1616 (21 December 2011) Kinnear v Whittaker [2011] EWCA Civ 1609 (21 December 2011) Q (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1610 (21 December 2011) Delaney v Pickett & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 (21 December 2011) Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd (t/a Galliford Try Rail)… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm
In late 2010, the Tribunal imposed AMPs of $20,000 and $10,000 against parties in Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm
In late 2010, the Tribunal imposed AMPs of $20,000 and $10,000 against parties in Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:14 pm
The two state Supreme Court cases (Shotts v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
In American Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 1:45 pm
"The decision is NBT Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.” This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Negative judicial reactions to the First Amendment may be imperfectly akin to negative judicial reactions to Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:06 am
(For the leading case on these issues in California, see Moeller v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am
However, many readers of this blog might be able to agree that state interests don't always align perfectly with the interests of the people. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am
However, many readers of this blog might be able to agree that state interests don't always align perfectly with the interests of the people. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:04 pm
Recently the Supreme Judicial Court ruled on the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:07 pm
Injunctions affecting speech are different in character than injunctions affecting other things, such as conduct, and even the cases that Abrams cites (such as Universal City Studios v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:07 pm
Injunctions affecting speech are different in character than injunctions affecting other things, such as conduct, and even the cases that Abrams cites (such as Universal City Studios v. [read post]
