Search for: "B&B LLC"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 12,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm
The Judge ruled that the Defendant had misled the Claimant over the functionality of the cameras and that this amounted to a breach of the requirement under Article 5(1)(b) the GDPR that data only be collected for ‘specified, explicit and legitimate purposes’. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 9:48 am
Moran of the Moran Law Group, LLC in Scranton, PA for bringing this case to my attention.Source of image: Photo by Edgar Moran on Unsplash.com. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:41 am
(CRD#:505), also of Melville Maxim Group LLC (CRD#:120708) of Woodbury, NY Wachovia Securities, LLC (CRD#:19616) of Manhasset, NY He has been in the industry since 1986. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
After Section 5533(b)(2) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
[A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.] [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 8:08 am
B. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
Valqari LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
Texas, 20-493Issue: Whether the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act provides the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), as set forth in the plain language of Section 107(b), the act’s legislative history and the Supreme Court’s holding in California v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:24 am
Two possible outcomes are that (a) the US company does all this anyway, saving foreign taxes but increasing its US tax liability due to subpart F, and (b) the US company decides against doing it, in which case there is no subpart F income but it is paying the higher taxes in Germany, France, and the UK that it would otherwise have avoided.Obviously, there is a big question as to why the US would seek to deter this tax planning. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:35 am
Video Game Palooza et al Case Number: 1:21-cv-02611-JMS-DMLFile Date: Monday, October 11, 2021Plaintiff: Edutainment Live, LLC d/b/a ITPRo. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 9:40 am
” 35 U.S.C. 112(b). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
[A new short article of mine, calved off my duty-to-take-down-libels article; I'd love to hear feedback, especially suggestions for a clearer title.] [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
First, Congress should act swiftly to provide the FTC with authority to pursue monetary relief under Section 13(b). [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Yes, this picture fitsBy Andy DelaneyI'm slacking on keeping this site updated. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:39 pm
On September 14, 2021, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a decision in the matter of Marquis Solutions, LLC B-419891, B-419891.2, sustaining a protest. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:19 am
LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Texas, 20-493Issue: Whether the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act provides the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), as set forth in the plain language of Section 107(b), the act’s legislative history and the Supreme Court’s holding in California v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:01 am
d/b/a RKE Contractors, Protester Re: E&L Construction Group, LLC), an unsuccessful bidder filed a protest of a set-aside contract award, alleging that the company was not unconditionally controlled by the disadvantaged owner. [read post]
