Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 2021 - 2040 of 15,423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2022, 4:25 pm by Howard Bashman
“2nd Comparative Constitutional Law Conversation: Chief Justice N V Ramana and Justice Breyer. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:20 pm by David Super
       Conversely, both senators voted to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:25 am by Whitney Hodges
For many in the cannabis industry, April 1, 2022 is seen as a day of reckoning following the July 2021 passage of Assembly Bill 141 and Senate Bill 160 (collectively, the Cannabis Trailer Bill). [read post]
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does not apply… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 11:52 am by familoo
And as we often submit to judges in line with a case called R v Lucas, witnesses lie for many reasons – shame, embarassment etc. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 9:58 am by Katherine Pompilio
Anderson were joined by Molly Reynolds to discuss the week’s big national security news including alleged war crimes committed by Russian forces in Ukraine and Torres v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Danielle Murray
  Most recently, the British Columbia Supreme Court found in Shalagin v Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, that Mercer (the employer) properly terminated its 12-year employee and senior financial analyst, Roman Shalagin, for cause because Shalagin had surreptitiously recorded numerous conversations with colleagues over a number of years. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:44 am by Katherine Pompilio
Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]