Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 2,237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2009, 10:08 am
Under the California Opinion Letter, an employer that experiences economic difficulties and, for example, reduces the work week of exempt employees from five days to four and also reduces their salary by 20% will not run afoul of the “salary basis” test for these workers to still be considered exempt under California state law. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:30 am
The Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor issued a letter earlier this year (see) explaining some of the criteria: “Under 29 C.F.R. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:41 am
The California Department of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) has issued an opinion letter in which it concludes that California law does not prohibit an employer from temporarily reducing the work schedule of an exempt employee from five days a week to four days a week, and correspondingly reducing the employee's salary by 20 percent. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 9:35 am
The DLSE opined that an employer could properly do this, without violating the salary basis test and without jeopardizing the exempt status of its employees under federal or California law. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
(Garrod owns a patent and has sent East Texas love letters to a large chunk of the Internet, and two smaller companies. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 11:50 am
District Court in California preliminarily enjoined implementation of the regulations. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 12:40 am
Employers can notify USCIS via e-mail or via letter mailed to the California Service Center. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 7:38 am
He took a law firm job in California in the Palo Alto area, moved all his stuff there, and showed up for work on a Monday, only to be told the job didn't exist anymore. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:28 pm
The termination letter stated, "Since you are being terminated from employment because of a violation of the [Agreement], you do not have a right of appeal. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 8:11 pm
Also on the subject of UK defamation law, in a landmark decision, the UK High Court rules Google not liable for defamation in search results, reports the California Defamation Law Blog. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:17 am
It seems that lawyers at Connor, Fletcher & Williams LLP in Irvine, California, noticed that a brief they had filed in the California Supreme Court (Edmond Connor of the firm describes it as "a 143 page brief[] that had taken us hundreds of hours to prepare in an employment discrimination case that we were handling on behalf of an indigent client") was "being marketed and sold to other attorneys by LexisNexis. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 10:53 am
Employers are reminded that the no-match letters represent only one form of constructive knowledge; ICE Worksite Enforcement cases maybe based on other forms of constructive knowledge. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:24 am
71%); JUDGES (70%); LAW SCHOOLS (69%); COLLEGE & ...CALIFORNIA, USA (92%); NEW YORK, USA (92%)
2. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:24 am
71%); JUDGES (70%); LAW SCHOOLS (69%); COLLEGE & ...CALIFORNIA, USA (92%); NEW YORK, USA (92%)
2. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
Bode a letter setting forth six incidents of improper documentation. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:00 am
The governor has sent letters and informational fliers to principals and librarians. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:42 pm
While California may have more cases of foreclosure, they are spread out over a larger area. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:45 pm
Ferguson, the outside counsel who had represented Munroe's employer at the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:00 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE EXHAUSTION/RIGHT TO SUE LETTER (BROWN) 13. [read post]
6 May 2009, 12:38 pm
This letter to the editor from two staff persons at Harvard Law School is misleading. [read post]
