Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 44,303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 12:35 pm
The recent United States Supreme Court case (Hurst v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
The justices hold that the ALJs ARE "officers of the United States" for purposes of the Appointments Clause.AND: Another case is Pereira v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am
Under that statute, the United States consents to state taxation of the pay or compensation of federal employees, but only if the state tax does not discriminate on the basis of the source of the pay or compensation. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:26 am
On December 6, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard arguments in Muldrow v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 7:10 pm
In re: Michelle Dougherty-Kelsay v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 8:53 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm
A United States District Court reversed the Bankruptcy Court, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit then reversed the District Court. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm
Harris, 338 N.C. 211, 223 n.1 (1994); see also United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 11:53 am
On June 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:01 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
Interpreting the Supreme Court of the United States’s ruling in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 11:27 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:13 am
In an opinion by Justice Sotomayor, the Court held that the supply of a single component of a multicomponent invention for manufacture abroad does not give rise to liability under Section 271(f)(1) of the Patent Act, which prohibits the supply from the United States of "all or a substantial portion of the components of a patented invention" for combination abroad. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
That is easier said than applied because personal jurisdiction does not turn on “‘mechanical’ tests” (Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
On February 4, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:45 am
This appeal relates only to the status of the land as trust land and does not involve the particulars of Indian gaming, which are the subject of separate proceedings and pending legislation. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
So, the State says, the measure does no more than deny homosexuals special rights. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Yet, some coverage has clearly misrepresented the opinion and falsely claimed that it makes abortion illegal in the United States. [read post]
