Search for: "Doctor v. State" Results 2021 - 2040 of 8,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2009, 6:51 pm
He asked the Doctor about an opinion he offered in his 2001 book that DRM would be a part of the future of the music business. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 2:28 pm by Ashley Ludlow
OBJECTIVE V:  Enabling the development of broadband-enabled health technologies that are designed to be fully accessible to people with disabilities. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Negligence in a doctors medical practice, which is called malpractice, is the doctors failure to comply with the standard of care in the care and treatment of his/her patient. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Negligence in a doctor's medical practice, which is called malpractice, is the doctor's failure to comply with the standard of care in the care and treatment of his/her patient. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 5:22 am by Steve Lubet
Here is the gist: Estelle Griswold’s surname is legally famous — Griswold v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:20 am by Walter Olson
[Michigan Health Law Link] Tags: discrimination law, medical, Michigan Related posts Update: McLeod v. [read post]
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Tuesday ruled that plaintiffs in The Arc of Iowa v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 3:13 pm
Under both federal and state charges, the penalties for possession of fentanyl is harsh if convicted. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:14 am by Guest Blogger
But the state justified both requirements as serving its interest in protecting women's health, and the Fifth Circuit, invoking Casey and Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:15 am by Katharyn Grant (US)
Although the Second Circuit’s December 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
According to the rules outlined in the most famous Supreme Court case on this topic (Daubert v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:07 am by Robert Wagner
The Court Finds the Composition Claims Are Patentable Subject Matter Before making its determination, the Court traced the state of the law regarding § 101 by looking at the Supreme Court’s decisions in Diamond v. [read post]