Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 2021 - 2040
of 2,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
Patent Nos: 5,246,937; 5,840,763; 5,866,581; 5,916,893; and 6,124,304. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:52 pm
The Board noted that the existence of these registrations does not evidence use, nor does it establish the public's familiarity with the marks. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:36 am
Bravo, Nos. 05-1144, 05-1145, 05-1146, 05-1147. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 11:43 pm
Nos. 1,229,591 and 1,905,508), the earlier one registered in 1983 and claiming a first use of July, 1966. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:36 pm
Nos. 2,695,589 for the logo and 2,697,721 for the word mark), and also has several pending trademark applications incorporating the word "Palermo's. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:42 am
MSAD 55, Nos. 06-1368 and 06-1422 (3/5/07) This case holds that a child with Asperger's Syndrome does indeed qualify as a "child with a disability" under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 11:52 pm
Nos. 4 & 1 v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Trans Union LLC, Nos.05-2289, 05-2360 (3/1/07) (unpublished). [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 5:49 am
Nos. 06-1512 and 06-1513 (3/1/07) This is a story of a company that constantly failed. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 10:42 pm
Patent Nos. 5,577,662 and 5,535,947 (both entitled "Embedded railway track system")), right of dismissal under Fed. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 11:39 am
., Nos. 2006-1265 & 2006-1302 (Fed. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
., Serial Nos. 76449597 and 78429952 (January 29, 2007) [not precedential].The Examining Attorney argued that "I" stands for "Internet," and that Applicant's own website describes Apotex's goods as being for use by pharmacists who utilize the Internet as a feature of the goods. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 7:29 am
Dayan, Docket Nos. 05-3443-cr (L), 05-4199-cr (CON) (2d Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 1:51 pm
NLRB, Nos. 05-2623, 05-2793. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 1:27 pm
Lemoure, Nos. 05-1377, 05-1440. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 3:31 pm
., Nos. 06-12419, 06-12420, 2007 WL 92756 (11th Cir. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 8:15 pm
Silva-Rengifo, Nos. 04-4302, 05-3423 (3d Cir. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 10:56 pm
., Nos. 05-1396, -1429, and -1430 (Fed. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:14 am
Patent Nos. 5,618,698 and 5,756,349). [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
Nos. 5,714,520, 5,731,355 and 5,731,356, literally and under the doctrine of equivalents, the CAFC found that the district court erred in its construction of "edetate" and reversed the finding of literal infringement but affirmed since the district court did not err in determining that the accused product infringes under the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
