Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 12,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2010, 1:42 pm
" (1) The U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
§ 2254(d)(1). [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 4:00 pm
The FLSA does not prohibit a valid tip pooling arrangement among employees who customarily and regularly receive tips. 29 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:07 am
__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar) does not change consumer, industry and government, nothing will. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:40 am
§ 207(a)(1). [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:05 pm
Therefore, the requirement of A 123(3) is fulfilled. [3.4]However, the Board does not consider the explanations of the [patentee] with regard to the requirement of A 123(2) to be correct. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
It follows that features (d), (f), (g) and (h) are not technical features of the claimed liquid formulation in the sense of R 29(1) and decision G 2/88. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:36 pm
This act shall take effect July 1, 2022. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:47 pm
The Court provided the following reasons: [28] Generally, the Court has discretion in relation to costs; however, where an offer to settle with specific terms as to costs has been accepted, to which Rule 9-1 applies, the Court does not have discretion to vary the terms of that agreement as they relate to costs. [29] In Buttar v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:15 pm
The disciplinary process was initiated when “Student 1” complained that John Doe physically attacked them on September 29-30. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:57 am
That would mean a possible decision on the certiorari petition on either April 24 or May 1, assuming the Court does not carry the matter forward. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 5:23 am
The EBSA issued FAB 2010-01 to answer some of the questions it received on FAB 2009-02, and on the "safe harbor rule" at 29 CFR 2510.3-2(f), which excludes qualifying 403(b) plans from ERISA (the "safe harbor"). [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 12:36 pm
Among 26 (90 percent) patients who reported onset dates, illness began a median of two days after the potluck (range 1-6 days). [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:44 pm
§ 29-26-121. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 6:56 am
See 29 C.F.R. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
It is worth noting, in this respect, that original claim 1 reproduces the passage of the description on page 2, lines 29-35, but omits the indication concerning simultaneous deskwork. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:43 pm
It does. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
The mere fact that the word ‘bobo’ and ‘ozmo’ share the same vowel ‘o’ does not make the two marks similar. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:23 am
Interviews were completed by YouGov online and by telephone between 1 April 2014 and 16 May 2014. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
Canada’s First Reverse Class Action Copyright Case | Guest Post: UK IPO Annual IP crime and enforcement report for 2018-2019 | There is No Such Thing as a Free Launch - CJEU Does Not Follow AG on Compensation for Wrongful PI | New CJEU referral on right of communication to the public... this time on seeding and de minimis threshold | [Guest Post] IP Education Series #1 | AIPPI Congress Report 4: Copyright in AI generated works | AG Pitruzzella advises CJEU to rule that… [read post]
