Search for: "FOX v. STATE" Results 2021 - 2040 of 3,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
Phelps, the funeral-protest case, and United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States, 359 U.S. 187 (1959), said the dual sovereignty doctrine permits both the State and the Feds to prosecute the same person for the same crime:The basic dilemma was recognized over a century ago in Fox v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Fox Broadcasting Co., 330 F.3d 1170, 1175 (9th Cir. 2003). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:53 am by Josh Sturtevant
It seems incredible for so many reasons that I first published the reprinted post below over a year ago...The Dual Critical Role and Culpability of the Media in State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Baxter: PTO Reexamination Decision Trumps Prior Decisions by the Federal Circuit http://t.co/i0NyO2l36t -> State AGs blast Google over YouTube ads for illicit products http://t.co/uSJ9k0zQeP -> Google Glass privacy concerns persist in Congress http://t.co/YDvZStJm7t -> State AGs say Google profits from harmful YouTube videosr http://t.co/XfUml6hzrR -> Apple sued over Siri in patent case in China http://t.co/QkVMRNgcO9 -> No Takedown and Staydown in France… [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]