Search for: "Franks v. Franks" Results 2021 - 2040 of 6,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 8:34 am by N. Peter Rasmussen
The court therefore had subject matter jurisdiction and accordingly denied the defendants' motion to dismiss.Leshinsky v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:49 pm by ipandentertainmentlaw
” At the heart of the suit are the alleged actions of Frank Ryan, the former general manager of the East Naples Rib City Grill location. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:49 am
Frank Cross of UT Law School, a critic of this view: Frank B. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 6:23 am
Soran, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Thursday, August 20, 2020 Editor's Note: Gail Weinstein is senior counsel and Steven Epstein and Matthew V. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:29 am by Richard Renner
Participants can ask questions, answer surveys, and post comments from their computer during the program.Topic for the webinar include: * The whistleblower reward provisions in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the proposed regulations implementing those provisions. * Dodd-Frank Act amendments strengthening the anti-retaliation provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the False Claims Act. * Three new whistleblower retaliation causes of action in the… [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 6:01 am
Soran, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Monday, November 26, 2018 Editor's Note: Gail Weinstein is senior counsel and Steven Epstein and Matthew V. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm by Sheila R. Carroll
Four key takeaways from the Supreme Court's decision in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 3:32 am by Jon Gelman
Peavler of the Fort Worth Regional Office.Related reading:"Indefensible" - More than $20 million for military incinerators up in smokeIn Re Burn Pit Litigation v KBR ….Jon L. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The constitutionality of the CFPB’s structure was front and center at this past Tuesday’s oral argument in PHH Corporation et al. v. [read post]