Search for: "Gay v. State" Results 2021 - 2040 of 3,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy writes that if the Supreme Court rules for the “faithless elector” in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:50 pm by Paul A. Prados
  Cuccinelli does not take this position lightly.Cuccinelli is opposed to state sponsored gay marriage. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am by Jon Hyman
Geiger doesn't like transgender people and is using her religion and the Supreme Court's decision in 303 Creative v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Evans, in which the Supreme Court struck down a law barring antidiscrimination protection for gay people. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:43 am by Lawrenz Fares
Hodges, the opinion that legalized gay marriage, and national security. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
DD, who was not himself abused, stated that, upon approaching defendant's desk, he had seen defendant with his hand down MM's pants. [read post]
In 1967, we represented Mildred and Richard Loving in their successful fight to end state bans on inter-racial marriage, in the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:49 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Dukes, the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit will hear oral arguments on Friday in Davis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:54 am
  (As of now, some of the state "gay rights" laws specifically disclaim any intent to require partnership benefits, while others are silent on the question.) [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm by Mark Walsh
(The first was on April 24, with two related patent decisions, one announced by Thomas, in Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
The new order said that the motion to open the way for gays and lesbians to marry was being denied “at this time. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
(That is not a reason to think that Brown was a mistake: it is simply a consequence of how judicial protection of controversial rights claims usually works in the United States.).Lawrence v. [read post]