Search for: "In Re: CONTEMPT"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MARCH 25, 2011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
This gets to the more troublesome aspect of the opinion: its apparent requirement that if you’re going to say anything bad about a judge, you’d better have “conclusive” proof that you’re right. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm
Elizabeth Watson, a “private investigator” who published allegations made by Haigh online, was subsequently sentenced to 9 months in prison (later suspended) for contempt of court arising from her blog about the case. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Case no. 11-12268 (11th Cir. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:51 pm
He may treat defendants with respect or with contempt. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
The post came to the attention of the magistrate, and the magistrate found Byron to be in contempt of court. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:58 am
"Everybody kind of goes on the assumption that you're going to crap out," U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:03 pm
Not in the case of In re: Edward Trae Green III, Case Number 09-17646-SSM, from the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:27 am
Current law leaves intact the possibility of charging victims with contempt and imposing fines. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
It can communicate good fun or extreme contempt. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
And, in the interest of full disclosure, I did use the word “doofus,” but didn’t call him that directly; I said something akin to “ if you’re going to mock another religion or culture, you should check your facts, first- otherwise, you’ll look like a doofus. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:50 am
The only situation I can think where it would affect family law is in a contempt case where the attorney is willing to take the case on the chance that his fees will be paid by the person in contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
The 11th Circuit just decided In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum March 25, 2011, USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:12 pm
But you have that right, but you’re way outside your bounds of first amendment rights. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
He then appealed that contempt order. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
., for instance, asked Verrilli if the government could criminalize lying about whether one received a high school diploma.In other news, the 11th Circuit came out with a fascinating opinion today (In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011 USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Make sure you know what you’re getting into. 2. [read post]
