Search for: "In Re Gray"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 2,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:14 am
Many students of games have dismissed this because of gray markets, other interpenetration between gamespace and elsewhere. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:39 pm
But you’re skeptical. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under section 271(f):… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
It was one of the gray, unknown areas of the nephew’s life that remain obscure. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 11:00 am
We’re going to be extending that to 60 days. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In a climate of reduced restraint on gray-space activity that seeks to exploit the full spectrum of coercive measures right up to the threshold of an armed attack, the same message also cautions against the use of cyber capabilities for more destructive or disruptive purposes. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
That work explores the motives that drive bankers' decisions and considers efforts to re-align those incentives. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
We cover everything, we’re a full-service law firm. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 5:29 am
Like, we’re we’re on the advisory board every day trying to find out what they’re thinking. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:47 pm
With each re-telling the well coached accusation becomes worse. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims (without cancelling the broader claims): Ex parte… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Clariti Eyewear, Inc. (271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) CAFC reverses BPAI's claim interpretation: In re Vaidyanathan (Gray on Claims) CAFC affirms claim construction and rejects indefiniteness argument: Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Inovia) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) USPTO/AIPLA Roundtable Report: Chinese utility models and design patents (IPKat) FTC report gives NPEs a new name (PAE), recommends that Courts and the PTO improve patent notice and damages (Patently-O) Uncle Sam v False Patent Marking (PatLit) Challenging USPTO decisions in the Courts (Patently-O) Decrease in new false marking cases filed post In re BP Lubricants (Gray on Claims) US Patents… [read post]
6 May 2009, 12:38 pm
"We're in tatters financially because of this thing," he said. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(Just an Examiner) Clean tech in court: Green patent complaint update (Green Patent Blog) Guest post: Mark Twain’s patent interference (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC on BPAI in In re Leithem: “This conclusory analysis is hardly persuasive (IPBiz) CAFC finds construction of term unnecessary: Respironics v Invacare (nonprecedential) (GRAY on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking statute is constitutional: Luka v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Falls Media, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB Precedential No 15: TTAB affirms rejection of website specimen for goods, ordering information lacking: In re Quantum Foods, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB enters summary judgment: Applicant lacked bona fide intent to use FEAR TH [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(GRAY on Claims) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Blocking attorneys from simultaneously litigating and prosecuting patents: In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Patently-O) CAFC: Muscle ad in magazine invalidates patent: Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc (IPKat) (IP Directions) CAFC: If patent troll sends the letter, then a case-or-controversy ‘implicitly’ is asserted: HP v Acceleron (ISinIP) District Court S D Florida denies… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Bridgeport Fittings (Gray on Claims) CAFC: The teeth of KSR: Obviousness on summary judgment: Tokai Corp. v. [read post]
