Search for: "In re: AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 2,915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 5:30 am
American courts, though justifiably proud of our system, should understand that other countries may organize their judicial systems as they see fit. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:36 pm
There is, in short, nothing fundamentally un-American about it. [read post]
28 May 2012, 6:05 pm
If anything, we’re moving backwards. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
(In re of Proposed New Shoreham Project, 25 A.3d 482, 2011.) [read post]
20 May 2012, 7:47 pm
Effective action is a scarce commodity in a town where the acquisition and retention of power trumps all other considerations, especially a notion as outdated as "principle. [read post]
20 May 2012, 12:56 pm
They're colorful. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:19 am
The action itself isn't without some curious problems, initially stemming from the fact that suit was brought in advance of someone being actually indefinitely detained. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm
Like most American universities, GSU declined to obtain licenses from CCC. [read post]
11 May 2012, 8:20 am
The American cases are being pursued under “class action” litigation. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
Any small claims procedure has to be guided by basic constitutional principles. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Pearson: American Eagle sought to register flying eagle logo; ran into problems with TM office in opposition, but were able to secure copyright, and that allowed persuasive demand letters. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
More principled approach: Coca-Cola v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:54 am
Re & Christopher M. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:30 pm
They're quaint and British and anglophiles love them, but I think we should go with names that say what they mean and mean what they say (it's the American way). [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 pm
Relying on the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation, the First Circuit rejected the presumption suggested by the concurrence in Klier v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:44 pm
As Justice Stevens explained, it isn’t the case that “an official action is protected by qualified immunity unless the very action in question has previously been held unlawful. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:42 am
In her article, Professor Lahav pointedly argues that the “formula” (the application of established statistical sampling methods) so derided in Dukes has several benefits, foremost the consistency that is a core principle in Anglo-American common law. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Supp 544, 1946, online here) The defendant school districts appealed and argued that the plaintiffs had not stated a federal cause of action. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
We know that Congress can regulate potential future actions under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:50 am
They’re struggling to attract new recruits. [read post]
