Search for: "Law v. State" Results 2021 - 2040 of 157,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2024, 3:41 pm by Amy Howe
In Aug. 2022, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:18 am by The Federalist Society
Rees is applicable when states are using a different execution protocol than the one involved in Baze v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:31 am by Jane Chong
United States by (1) the National Institute of Military Justice and (2) Professor David Glazier of Loyola Law School. [read post]
The post Kansas judge blocks state abortion laws including restrictions on medication appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am by MBettman
On April 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 4:26 pm
Michael Lewis Wells and Alice Snedeker (University of Georgia Law School) have posted State-Created Property and Due Process of Law: Filling the Void Left by Engquist V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am by Mark Graber
  Again, developments in state capacity to fight crime (and the capacity of criminals to commit crimes) probably had more to do with the development of probable cause under the Fourth Amendment then the precise common law standard when state bills of rights were ratified or common law practice as described in dusty English texts.Entick v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
State Tax Law in a Post-Windsor World, 47 Creighton L. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 5:28 am by Reproductive Rights
Frederick Mark Gedicks (BYU Law School) has posted the Brief of Amici Curiae Church-State Scholars in Support of the Government in Sebelius v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:54 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, UIC John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Chiafalo v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm by Zachary Spilman
Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]