Search for: "Lee v. Howes" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 5:38 am by INFORRM
It will be interesting to see how, if at all, the government responds to the report. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:00 am by Adam Gillette
  Also readers are educated on how to take political action against "Islamist infiltration. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The subject of how employers potentially having access to employees’ social media credentials continues to be a much-discussed topic on the LexBlog Network, as we have two posts on that today. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:18 am by Jennifer
King (Annex KF 228 .K36 K56 2006) Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/IDkEed (Stephanie Overby) How Long Should I Keep Records, and What Should I Keep? [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
In her post, she explores how the protection of British citizens’ privacy is surprisingly low, and how there are proposals to extend the abilities of government bodies to intercept communications, acquire or disclose data, and use “covert human intelligence sources” – powers that are already extensive under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Tim Wu, Laura DeNardis, Andrew Odlyzko, Deven Desai, and Brett Frischmann himself. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Addison Lee and bus lanes Joshua Rozenberg reports on the Guardian on the High Court having granted Transport for London an interim injunction against Addison Lee, which operates Europe’s biggest fleet of private-hire vehicles (Transport for London (TfL) v Griffin & Ors [2012] EWHC 1105 (QB) (26 April 2012). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am by Randy Barnett
  In my essay, I explain how the lower court in Lee Optical actually did this quite effectively after dutifully invoking the presumption of constitutionality. [read post]