Search for: "London v. State"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 1:47 pm
Today is the ninth anniversary of Kelo v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am
R (Moseley) v London Borough of Haringey, heard 19 June 2014. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
The London Telegraph posted a martini quiz. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
I would be more than delighted to gain that experience either in London or Southern England preferably but, should the right opportunity arise, I would gladly work anywhere in the UK. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
Barclays operates in fifty countries with particularly large business operations in New York and London. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:12 am
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has said no to the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild’s (ACCG) request to challenge issues previously argued in the case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:10 am
City of New London, we find rhetoric signaling legislative and judicial alignment with affluence. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
Also on Thursday 19 June 2014, the Court will hear the appeal of R (Moseley) v London Borough of Haringey. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:03 am
In Miele v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Entitled "The Protection of Corporate Reputations", it's led by Martin Howe QC(8 New Square) and Justin Rushbrooke QC (5RB), who will consider the current state of the law for protecting corporate reputations. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am
City of New London, in which the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm
It also avoided the asked-for reconsideration of Missouri v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom issued a ruling on the status of equity partners in law firms that flies in the face a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada.On May 22, the SCC ruled in McCormick v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am
This would prevent judges from åany enticement to lend the prestige of the judicial office to benefit other interests.[122] It would also have the beneficial effect of preventing the appearance of judicial impropriety.[123] . . . . _____________________________ 84 Judiciary of England and Wales, Guide to Judicial Conduct 2013 (London: Judges’ Council, 2013) Acknowledgements at 4 [Guide], onli [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
City of New London, we find rhetoric signaling legislative and judicial alignment with affluence. [read post]
17 May 2014, 4:37 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
The judge in Gardener v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
”, Helena Kennedy QC, Kings College London. 24 and 25 May 2014 “Understanding Transition, Austerity, Communication and the Media“, University of Bucharest. [read post]
