Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2020, 3:49 pm
T. has so far been resolved only “on an interim basis,” Brief for Respondent 56, n. 13, and that custody proceedings, including the matter of M. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 5:29 am
The correct decision here will also matter a lot. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:51 am
” First, the court of appeals reversed the dismissal of the complaint under Rule 9(b). [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:20 am
Judge Douglas B. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am
(henceforth jointly referred to as opponent O2) citing Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.III. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
B(A), 2008 NBQB 157, the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench (Family Division) admitted into evidence photographs found online that showed the mother dancing at a bar, drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:33 am
’” The statement was thus, as a matter of law, not impliedly false. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:09 pm
I don’t rule out the possibility that it’s true, but there doesn’t seem to be any survey or other evidence supporting it. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
Although I think it shouldn’t ultimately matter, I wonder if the government will pick up on this panel holding as it relates to Blackhorse; if §43(a) doesn’t require trademark rights, that implies that cancellation would not end the Washington team’s federally enforceable rights.] [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:33 am
T. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
§ 1127) as follows:[T]he bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. [read post]
14 May 2017, 5:28 pm
And, the t-shirts the GLSO sought to order from HOO are an example of its support and advocacy of others…. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 6:32 pm
However, “[t]he District Court does have discretion to limit the scope of discovery. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Kalish’s testimony on this matter was, thus, not admissible under Rule 404(b). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
ENTER: Maria T. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
ENTER: Maria T. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Co. v Legend Abstract Corp., 171 AD3d 705, 706 [2d Dept 2019]; Shon v State of New York, 75 AD3d 1035, 1038 [3d Dept 2010]).Footnote 3: Claimant's contention that the taking of the depositions of his medical experts telephonically was improper (see CPLR 3115 [b]) was waived by his failure to object at the time that the depositions were taken (see CPLR 3115 [b]; Matter of Washington v Montefiore Hosp., 7 AD3d 945, 947-948 [3d Dept 2004]). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Co. v Legend Abstract Corp., 171 AD3d 705, 706 [2d Dept 2019]; Shon v State of New York, 75 AD3d 1035, 1038 [3d Dept 2010]).Footnote 3: Claimant's contention that the taking of the depositions of his medical experts telephonically was improper (see CPLR 3115 [b]) was waived by his failure to object at the time that the depositions were taken (see CPLR 3115 [b]; Matter of Washington v Montefiore Hosp., 7 AD3d 945, 947-948 [3d Dept 2004]). [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 1:54 pm
When Juliet says the Montague name isn’t important to her, she means what matters is what something is, not what it is called. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
& Catherine T. [read post]
