Search for: "Matter of Kennedy" Results 2021 - 2040 of 4,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The breakdown of the vote, however, was not the usual matter of the four liberalish justices disagreeing with the four movement conservatives and Justice Kennedy casting the deciding vote. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am by Miriam Seifter
” This position, too, drew skepticism, this time from Roberts and Kennedy. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm by Rory Little
” No matter how you define the claim, the city maintains, any limitations period must run either from the date of the arrest or from the first day that Manuel was “detained pursuant to legal process,” and not from some later “favorable termination” of the charges. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:18 am
 Justice Kennedy quoted that language in his dissent in the 1990 Metro Broadcasting case, adding in a comparison to South African apartheid laws. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:06 am by Kent Scheidegger
Short term, Hobby Lobby is precedent no matter who succeeds Justice Kennedy; long term, the issue will be moot.Here is a handy rule of thumb for evaluating comments like Senator Harris's. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am by Laura Sandwell
In Courtroom 1 from Tuesday 29 until Thursday 31 October 2013 is the matter of Kennedy v The Charity Commission. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am by Dan Markel
The majority opinion, written by Justice Stevens, was joined by Kennedy and the rest of the fab 4; Roberts and Alito concurred in the judgment, and Scalia & Thomas dissented. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:02 am by SHG
  It just doesn't seem good enough that the stability of the law hinges on a single justice, no matter how brilliant or well-intended the vote may be. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 8:11 am by Chuck Becker
” The letter goes on to “encourage” the agencies to start the rulemaking process fresh, open the matter to an advanced notice of proposed rule-making to obtain public input, and to do a cost-benefit analysis of whatever proposed rule is developed. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:10 am by Milligan J. G. Goldsmith
” As a matter of property law, Luis owned the assets outright, and the government had no interest in the assets before conviction. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:06 am by Ilya Somin
As Kennedy put it for the Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm by Jeff Foust
“Cancellation [of Constellation] was therefore simply a matter of time and thankfully we have a president with the political courage to do the right thing sooner rather than later,” Musk said in a statement released shortly before the speech, which he said could be as important as President Kennedy’s 1962 Rice University speech. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:58 am by Anna Christensen
Justice Kennedy couldn’t resist a joke, as he retorted,“Well, you can be pleased that I was not the trial judge. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
magazine, Fran Korten notes that “[n]o matter how the court rules” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]