Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 118,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2022, 12:17 am
In March, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
This intent may be explicitly stated in the law (known as express preemption) or a court may infer that intent (known as implied preemption). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:42 pm
Status Spencer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am
State v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:51 am
On June 24, in Fisher v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 1:42 pm
In Rose v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 6:03 am
“The Abortion Fight and the Pretense of Precedent: State legislators have proposed Draconian new laws on the assumption that, when they come before the Supreme Court, they will be used to vanquish Roe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:11 am
In State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
” State v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am
Greece International Extradition Treaty with the United States May 6, 1931 and November 1, 1932, Date-Signed November 1, 1932, Date-In-Force STATUS: Treaty and exchange of notes signed at Athens on May 6, 1931. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 10:22 am
The case is New York State Department of Environmental conservation, et al., v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:29 pm
White v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:14 am
In 1996, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held in Rachal v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:21 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:37 am
The post provides some background information, how to use, and what results may be expected.These are useful resources if you don't have access to a subscription database but want to follow federal and state legislation.Ernster, the Virtual Library Cat [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
