Search for: "Minor v. State"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 14,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
[cite to LW v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
But the court did not act on the government’s allegations that the minor’s counsel had engaged in misconduct. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:59 am
On Wednesday, November 3, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied one application for leave to appeal, denied one motion for reconsideration, granted leave to the State Bar of Michigan and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel to file briefs amicus curiae in Pellegrino v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
In Thai Meditation Association of Alabama, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:13 am
In its unanimous decision handed down last week in Matter of Hoffman v S.T.H.M. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:08 am
There is nothing about the basic fact pattern here that should limit the logic of this ruling to a minority of drugs or states. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:58 am
Those waiting for a decision in the hotly-anticipated Ricci v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:31 am
" That's not as tough as the standard for intervening federal authority, which requires "clearly irreconcilable" precedent, but still tougher than the very "permissive" state law standard set forth in this opinion.A somewhat minor change, perhaps. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
In some instances, like in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
In Kahn et al v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:12 am
” Radu v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:15 am
The majority in State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 11:14 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Gore, therefore, was stating that for that case only, stare decisis would not apply. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
In Victory v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Removal of an officer of a political subdivision of the State for misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in officeMatter of Hedman v Town Bd. of Town of Howard, 2008 NY Slip Op 09229, decided on November 21, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth Department Gerald S. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:12 am
Additional Resources: Bryan M. v. [read post]
