Search for: "Montana State Supreme Court"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 2,756
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 1:20 pm
The latest evidence of this comes from Montana and a recent decision by the Montana Supreme Court. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
MontanaDocket: 10-218Issue(s): 1) Whether the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes requires a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union; and 2) whether, when a hydropower project is licensed under the Federal Power Act, a State's attempt to claim title and impose rent obligations for use of the riverbeds is… [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm
No problem it seems for Google’s music locker (IP Osgoode) ICE seizes more domains today, admin says ‘We’ll be back’ (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) ‘Hi, my name is…Slim Shady’ and your ringtone is a licence (IP Whiteboard) US Copyright – Decisions District Court Montana: Another ruling that the Americans with Disabilities Act doesn’t apply to websites: Ouellette v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:29 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0435, 2011 MT 112, DAVID W. and JOANN A. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:25 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0388, 2011 MT 111, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:23 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0231, 2011 MT 110, TERRY BLANTON, individually and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants, v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:51 am
This was the third time Arnold had been tried for the crime; the first trial ended in a mistrial, and her second conviction was overturned by an Ohio appellate court last November.Indiana Ruling Sparks Protest: The AP reports a ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court (see previous post here) that there is no constitutional right to resist unlawful police entry into a home has sparked outrage from lawmakers, threats to the court, and a planned rally… [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:00 pm
Bankruptcy Court Montana disagreed in the case of In re Baker, holding the deduction as valid. [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:01 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0381, 2011 MT 108, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:21 am
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the trial court in its decision. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:27 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: OP 10-0280, 2011 MT 104, UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, Petitioner v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:04 am
Supreme Court denied a stay of execution. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:56 am
But will the Court leave state common law remedies as a possibility? [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:39 pm
Research Tip – May 11, 2011 You have found an opinion or order from the Montana Supreme Court which you think is critical to your case. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:51 pm
Montana Law; currently a Senior Fellow at the Independence Institute); and Prof. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:47 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: OP 11-0206, 2011 MT 97N, THE OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Petitioner, v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
Montana Says Timothy Blixseth Admits Owing Taxes The state of Montana filed papers on May 4 opposing the motion by Timothy Blixseth for dismissal of the involuntary Chapter 7 petition filed against him by three states a month earlier. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:57 pm
Supreme Court — that greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:27 am
In fact, the rules of the Supreme Court do allow them to exercise original jurisdiction in such cases, but they never do, leaving them for the district courts; they limit their grants of original jurisdiction to disputes between two states. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court also properly determined that personal jurisdiction over the defendants was not conferred pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(3) based upon tortious activity occurring outside New York, causing injury within New York. [read post]
