Search for: "People v. Branch"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am
As a matter of U.S. government policy, people generally do not receive notice of this surveillance, even after the surveillance has ended and even where notice would not jeopardize an active investigation. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
(2) Campbell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 9:34 pm
For background on this dispute, check out my earlier posts: "Danone v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
The House of Representatives was supposed to return to Capitol Hill on Monday, May 4, after a lengthy recess interrupted sporadically by brief returns to vote on coronavirus-related relief bills. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
Virginia] and [Witt v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 7:47 pm
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:19 pm
In 2019, in the Zhou et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Thursday, Jan. 9, 2:00 p.m.: The Brookings Institution, the American Political Science Association, and the R Street Institute will be hosting an expert panel debating the role of Congress and the changes that need to be made for Congress to meet the current challenges facing American political institutions. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:27 pm
The Court in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:13 am
In Gaylor v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court observed in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:42 pm
The DOJ subsequently prosecuted dozens of people nationwide on the basis of this single “NIT warrant. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:31 pm
, Bush v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm
The Minnesota Judicial Branch maintains a useful handbook, as well as an informative video, for prospective jurors, here. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm
The Minnesota Judicial Branch maintains a useful handbook, as well as an informative video, for prospective jurors, here. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
There is a rigorous review process of applications submitted by the executive branch, spearheaded initially by five judicial branch lawyers who are national security experts and then by the judges, to ensure that the court’s authorizations comport with what the applicable statutes authorize. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
People who marry want to have their friends and family around for the ocasion, and that will be far easier to arrange in Connecticut for most New Yorkers. [read post]
