Search for: "People v. Render" Results 2021 - 2040 of 4,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 2:32 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  A decision cannot be rendered unreasonable by information never presented to the decider. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
As IPKat readers will know, a few weeks ago the US Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited judgment in Google v Oracle. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:40 am by INFORRM
  This question is now before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Dareskizb v. [read post]
1 Feb 2025, 12:36 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In Sleeper v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2025] EWHC 151 (KB), Mr Ian Sleeper was a street preacher. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
The Supreme Court unanimously held that Ukraine had a justiciable and arguable defence of duress based on Russia’s alleged threats to Ukrainian people or property. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:44 pm
 As noted by the Appellate Division in the recently decided Boghosian v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:11 am by Gritsforbreakfast
IMO the reason for choosing 50-60 feet instead of, say, 10-15, is that most cell-phone cams don't have a zoom function and can't take good pictures from such a distance, rendering the resulting video all but useless.RELATED: Police v. cameras: A recurring conflict. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is Park Place Motorcars Mid Cities Ltd., and Park Place Motorcars of Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Here are some preliminary observations on the opinions in Michigan v. [read post]