Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 2021 - 2040 of 3,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2014, 6:34 pm by Arina Shulga
Muller, filed in Suffolk, Mass., Superior Court, KNF&T alleged its former vice president Charlotte Muller violated her non-compete contract in a variety of ways, including her announcement of her new job on LinkedIn. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
            In our post on the worst decisions of 2013, we highlighted two trilogies of dreck, the First Circuit’s Neurontindecisions and the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s Reglan decisions. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:04 am by admin
(Misleading Advertising and Performance Claims) On August 19, 2013, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued its decision in the Chatr advertising case (Canada (Competition Bureau) v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the ruling in Vivendi Canada Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice Ewaschuk of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
Since then, a succession of Maricopa County Superior Court judges have served as watchdog for people with mental-health issues, monitoring state funding and hearing arguments about the adequacy of care, from housing to employment to skills training. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:30 pm
Zolghadr, RIC1306769, Riverside County Superior Court, filed 6/10/13). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
  Pennsylvania is saddled with a very pro-plaintiff Superior (intermediate appellate) Court, and in the ReglanTrilogy, that court  ignored what even it called a “tsunami” of contrary precedent to hold practically all (except for pre-2007 warning claims) the generic drug-related claims before it were not preempted. [read post]