Search for: "People v. White"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 7,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2014, 2:46 pm
The following is the text of the letter:February 14, 2014President Barack ObamaThe White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20500The Honorable Arne Duncan, Secretary of EducationU.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 2:11 am
Or the Hoover Institution's Adam White. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm
There is some good news: The government had also moved to stay First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Supreme Court decisions, Kisela v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
Garner through Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:47 am
Yesterday, we had a new UMG v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
Sell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
As stated in an analysis by White House Dossier (the blog of White House reporter Keith Koffer, who writes for CongressDaily, National Journal, Roll Call and Politico), the cost to taxpayers for the C-32 was $430,000 alone. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Peter DiCola: White-Smithisn’t as clean as that either. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Peoples Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0309p.06 2008/08/22 Clemmer v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
White, 39 So.2d 799, 800 (Fla.1949). [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:30 pm
A man who was opposed to Roe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
One man wore a white t-shirt and flannel plaid-looking pajama pants. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
Whether Trump’s comments represent an intentional deflection or merely reflect misaligmed priorities, most people can agree without defending leaking that the leaks are probably not the “real scandal” here. [read post]
