Search for: "Pool v. State" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Like Lady Poole, Lord Brailsford is a Senator of the College of Justice. [read post]
Another commenter suggested permitting state courts (as well as federal circuit courts) to certify cases to the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:24 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Maryland is one of just four states along with the District of Columbia that follows this unfair rule. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
Thompson case, in which a majority of the Court held that the city government of Jackson, Mississippi did not violate equal protection by closing the city's pools, rather than integrating them. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
 Then, I thought that given the traditional deference shown to state courts on matters of state law, the SCOTUS wouldn't take the case. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Kara M. Maciel
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided Castellanos- Contreras v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:35 pm
``There's a mechanism set in place for them to become part of that pool of qualified attorneys.'' Eleven lawyers have agreed to defend Guantánamo detainees facing death penalty charges at the war court, said Romero, whose offices are eight blocks from the former World Trade Center, which was ''Ground Zero'' on Sept. 11, 2001. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
However, in some circumstances, such as a childless, short marriage without pooling of assets a prenuptial agreement may have ‘magnetic importance’ for the division of assets (as shown in Crossley v Crossley [2008] 1 FLR 1467). [read post]