Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 2021 - 2040 of 14,232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-08-23: Copyhype Friday’s Endnotes – 08/15/14 http://t…. http://t.co/Hhq8jcURrI -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-08-23 http://t.co/ZoOucpLlCP -> Statements on Web can be misrepresentations Hazjizadeh v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 CanLII 48552 http://t.co/Rmc0Czbvra -> TripQuest found confusing with MapQuest, MapQuest v The Lodging Company Reservations… [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-08-23: Copyhype Friday’s Endnotes – 08/15/14 http://t…. http://t.co/Hhq8jcURrI -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-08-23 http://t.co/ZoOucpLlCP -> Statements on Web can be misrepresentations Hazjizadeh v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 CanLII 48552 http://t.co/Rmc0Czbvra -> TripQuest found confusing with MapQuest, MapQuest v The Lodging Company Reservations… [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
I appreciate Johnsen’s candor, as she admits what the ACLU and other Attorneys General tap-dance around. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm by Peter Margulies
  The government showed a couple of years ago in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (finding that the Attorney General had qualified immunity in a lawsuit by a material witness detained in a terrorism investigation) that persuading a judge or judges in an en banc rehearing to write a well-crafted dissent can pave the way for a victory at the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, to the extent that the plaintiff’s action may be premature because, while the underlying action is pending, it cannot be determined whether the defendant’s alleged legal malpractice proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain damages (see generally Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 542-543; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1006; Stein Indus., Inc. v… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am by lsammis
Attorney for Cultivation of Marijuana Cases in Tampa, Hillsborough CountyThe Attorneys at the Sammis Law Firm are members of the NORML Legal Committee dedicated to fighting for the reform of marijuana laws in Florida. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
Meet Marriage of Sagonowsky On December 21, 2016, San Francisco based First Appellate District issued a partly published decision in the case of Sagonoswky v. [read post]