Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2010, 10:35 am
The opinion, in Roadtrips, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:46 am
In Stewart v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
On February 12, 2015, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Sundberg v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Hugunin v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:41 pm
In FTC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
The seller’s copy of a digital work would transfer to the buyer; the seller would no longer retain access to the work. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:48 am
Cigar Ass’n of Am. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:48 am
For more on the Apple-Proview case, check out “Apple v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:48 am
For more on the Apple-Proview case, check out "Apple v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:41 am
Mead, an Ohio corporation, is a producer and seller of paper supplies. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 3:39 pm
Ryan v London Borough of Islington [2009] EWCA Civ 578 concerned Ms Ryan’s Right to Buy under Part V Housing Act 1985 and whether or not it had been deemed to be withdrawn. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 5:10 am
The Supreme Court in Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:59 am
Such transactions are “intangible” and often anonymous, and determined buyers and sellers could frequently circumvent regulations. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:30 pm
See GunBroker.com LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:39 am
Smajlaj v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]