Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
Blum, who is the Director of Center for the Study of Tobacco & Society, and a chaired professor at the University of Alabama, is a leading authority on the history of tobacco use and the depradations of the tobacco industry. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Blum, who is the Director of Center for the Study of Tobacco & Society, and a chaired professor at the University of Alabama, is a leading authority on the history of tobacco use and the depradations of the tobacco industry. [read post]
These documents, eventually known as the Pentagon Papers, chronicled the United States’ involvement with Vietnam for decades. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm by John Ross
She sues his employer (the United States) for negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:02 am by Abbe R. Gluck
” In this regard, it is interesting to note that the leading precedent the government relies on is United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
Means of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas -- whose previous stay order I discussed in the post just linked -- has now extended his stay to all further proceedings in the federal lawsuit filed against Bishop Iker, pending resolution of the proceedings in State court. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
  Click to read the full court opinion State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Alicia Maule
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Keisler, No. 06-60644"Pakistani native's petition for review of a denial of his application for cancellation of removal from the United States is denied as misuse of a social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 408(a)(7)(A) falls within the definition a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of ineligibility for a grant of cancellation of removal. [read post]