Search for: "State v. Best"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 25,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Plus there are dozens of district attorneys (plus the California Attorney General) aware of the problem and with access to the sympathetic ear of state legislators.Given this fact, I decided that it's probably best to simply let this one sit. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Because I'm not a moron, and have also been an attorney for a quarter century now, and even I can't fully follow the Ninth Circuit's explanation today as to what it means (or what we have to tell a jury) when we say that someone who ships firearms from one state to another may be acting in "willful"violation of the law.If even someone like me can't fully understand what we're saying, how in God's Green Earth can we expect a jury of laypeople… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:36 am
Greene and Alford v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 9:29 pm
Mississippi State University v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:31 am
” The Fifth District also relied on Baker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Circuit’s decision in CREW v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:26 am
We have just learned of a fifth motion to vacate ex parte order being made, in the RIAA's campaign against college students, this one by a "John Doe" who is a student at North Carolina State University, in LaFace v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:35 pm
Sims, and from United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 1:55 pm
Judge Leonie Brinkema, of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:38 am
Stern v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Archived here: Articles The Indian States of America: Parallel Universes & Overlapping Sovereignty – Joseph William Singer The Leonard Peltier Case: An Argument in Support of Executive Clemency Based on Norms of International Human Rights – Joseph Ezzo State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
numerous states, with inconsistent results. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:10 pm
The Washington (state) Supreme Court, in Sleasman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
On October 1, 2019, plaintiffs in Brackeen v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
(See McCollum v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
A Counter-Example: Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
