Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 22,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
The tax was also impermissible, Polar Tankers argued, because it was not designed to charge for services provided uniquely to vessels in its port but was rather an attempt to export the City's local tax burden to out-of-state entities. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1959 case of Bibb v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Could a state mandate a 24-hour waiting period for an abortion? [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 7:12 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:02 am
Lowdermilk v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
In Hutton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 4:13 pm
United States Forest Service. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:25 am
United States Forest Service. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm
The Court stated that where the state court’s decision is not accompanied by an explanation, the habeas petitioner has the burden of proving that “there was no reasonable basis for the state court to deny relief. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:23 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm
In Machado v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
Charles C.L.A. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Regards, Roy] Walmart v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
When Congress Giveth, is the Dormant Commerce Clause Taken Away?--Free Speech Coalition v. Shurtleff
7 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Prior to CAN-SPAM, a court had to evaluate whether a state law impermissibly burdened out-of-state commerce, and no medium is more interstateâ€â [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 6:10 pm
It's second hand and not for attribution, but it's the first thing approaching a blow-by-blow we've seen on the Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:40 pm
Court of Appeal stated in R. v. [read post]