Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 29,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:59 pm
The 16th Amendment was proposed by Congress on July 12, 1909, and finally ratified by the states on February 3, 1913 (1,302 days). [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 4:05 am
Supreme Court's decision in Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:24 am
Professor Richard Epstein, of The University of Chicago Law School, has this article about Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:58 pm
In Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:58 am
Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:57 am
Supreme Court Decides Jones v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
While we know from Reno v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:46 am
Justice Kagan cited Anderson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:43 pm
Lewin (a/k/a Baehr v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am
The Constitution constrains states from excessively burdening out-of-state commerce – a doctrine known as the dormant commerce clause, because it is implicit in the grant of power to Congress to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:19 am
Read the full text of the Coleman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Connecticut (contraception,) Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:10 pm
When Congress passed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, the primary feature was supposed to be a reform that promised states a rapid and efficient trip through federal review if only they provided adequate counsel for state collateral review, which most states did at the time anyway. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:14 am
Quesada v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
First, it reiterates its Spending Clause argument: because the IDEA was enacted pursuant to Congress's Spending Clause power, it must provide clear notice of any conditions that are attached to a state's acceptance of federal funds. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:28 am
AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:52 am
If they are required to follow the First Amendment, then Congress cannot override those constitutional obligations by statute. [read post]
