Search for: "State v. G. D. F." Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
Therefore, a simple authorisation for ‘cameras' is usually insufficient;(f) poor internal audit by senior management. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:00 am by Chris Whytock
Outside the post-FNC context, in Society of Lloyd’s v. [read post]
22 Jul 2006, 11:22 am
Since the cause of action is created by a federal statute, a federal court has jurisdiction over the case (which means it will be heard by a federal court).Section 1030(g) states that any "person who suffers damage or loss by reason of a violation of this section may maintain a civil action against the violator to obtain compensatory damages and injunctive relief or other equitable relief. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm by admin
Webber cited to an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) document,[6] which stated that “[f]or the purposes of public health assessment and protection, [the] EPA makes no distinction between fibers and cleavage fragments of comparable chemical composition, size, and shape. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
The one possible difference between the criminal libel trial and the criminal contempt trial in a catchall injunction case is that a jury must be provided in most criminal cases—including criminal libel cases—if the maximum statutory authorized sentence is over 6 months (or some lower threshold set by state law), but a jury must be provided in criminal contempt cases only if the actual sentence is over 6 months. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
The stated purpose of the CRARA was to "improve ratings quality for the protection of investors and in the public interest by fostering accountability, transparency, and competition in the credit rating agency industry. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]