Search for: "State v. Heard" Results 2021 - 2040 of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am by MBettman
” Justice DeWine, to Cleveland’s Law Department Chief Counsel On March 6, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in City of Cleveland v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:46 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Bartlett v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Beth Graham
Last Thursday, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument in CMH Homes, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Golan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:30 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Conor McEvily
The Court heard oral arguments in two cases yesterday. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday, the New York Court of Appeals-- the state's highest court-- heard oral arguments in Matter of Maetreum of Cybele, Magna Mater, Inc. v McCoy. [read post]
6 May 2021, 11:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Connecticut Supreme Court heard oral arguments (audio of full arguments) in Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:15 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, April 25, 2016, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 6:54 am by Howard Friedman
On Friday, the U.S.9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The Texas Supreme Court yesterday heard oral arguments (video of full oral arguments) in Hensley v. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
On June 3, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments (video of full arguments) in Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
The State charged and convicted Barrios of capital murder, but did not seek the death penalty. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]