Search for: "State v. K. T." Results 2021 - 2040 of 3,544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm by Joey Fishkin
 (Indeed, you are required by law to get it—or perhaps not exactly required, see NFIB v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
Under The Text and Original Meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause, The Office Must Fall Vacant During The Recess The Recess Appointments Clause states that “[t]he President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This judgement is in agreement with the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal (in particular T 1186/05 [3.6.1-5]; T 708/05 [3]). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am by Veronika Gaertner
Dieter Martiny: “Deutscher Kündigungsschutz für das Personal ausländischer Botschaften? [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am by Ken White
Before he applied to a judge for a warrant, Officer Chavez asked Deputy District Attorney Daniel T. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor could the employee convince the court to revive his claim that his termination violated Oklahoma state law and was prohibited by Burk v K-Mart Corp. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
Therefore, in December 2011, the Nova Scotia Court entered a default judgmentagainst Handshoe which stated that “`[i]n accordance with the Civil Procedure Rule 31.12(4), Douglas K. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 2:30 pm by Howard Knopf
(AC alone can’t sue for infringement since it isn’t the copyright owner). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
She then sued the practice asserting claims under Title VII and state law for gender discrimination and retaliation as well as various other state law claims. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:54 am by Bexis
  [T]he [FDA] focuses on the technological differences that are medically and scientifically significant and avoids the difficulties that would arise from a mechanistic application of rigid formal criteria to the wide variety of substantial equivalence questions posed by new devices proposed for marketing under a 510(k). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Larry Catá Backer
 "[T]he Forum aims to serve as a key annual venue for stakeholders from all regions to engage in dialogue on business and human rights, and to strengthen engagement towards the goal of effective and comprehensive implementation of the Guiding Principles. [read post]