Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 2021 - 2040 of 44,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:32 am
The brief, submitted in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Marion County Elections Board, which allowed states to enforce voter ID laws and make it harder for people to vote The Court v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A State Supreme Court Justice has preliminary enjoined the County of Rockland from imposing an "Emergency Declaration" preventing any unvaccinated children under the age of 18 from entering any "place of public assembly," defined as any place where 10 or more people congregate, including schools.The case is W.D. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by Orin Kerr
Justice Nelson (joined by Justice Wheat) suggests that under United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am by Richard Primus
  Right now, there is a pending suit in state court in New York raising that next question.The suit, Zervos v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:10 am by David G. Badertscher
Bragg NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Adjournment 'Occasioned by Exceptional Circumstances' Ruled Excludable People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Based on a statement of interest filed by the State Department with the court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter of La Reunion Aerienne v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It also considered whether anything that constitutes needing “prompting” to be able to engage with other people also constitutes social support, subject to it being provided by a person trained or experienced in assisting people to engage in social situations. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am by Bruce Ackerman
With the Civil Rights Act moving forward in the Senate,  the Court refused to undercut the state action doctrine in Bell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Aaron Weems
Hodges the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex which was lawfully entered into in another state. [read post]