Search for: "State v. Poole" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
 Then, I thought that given the traditional deference shown to state courts on matters of state law, the SCOTUS wouldn't take the case. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Kara M. Maciel
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided Castellanos- Contreras v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
However, in some circumstances, such as a childless, short marriage without pooling of assets a prenuptial agreement may have ‘magnetic importance’ for the division of assets (as shown in Crossley v Crossley [2008] 1 FLR 1467). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
But for the last two, the Court has relisted because at the last Conference, the Justices voted to call for the record (“CFRecord” in the language of cert. pool memos) and the record materials have since arrived. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:24 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Maryland is one of just four states along with the District of Columbia that follows this unfair rule. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
Thompson case, in which a majority of the Court held that the city government of Jackson, Mississippi did not violate equal protection by closing the city's pools, rather than integrating them. [read post]
Another commenter suggested permitting state courts (as well as federal circuit courts) to certify cases to the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
(Patent Baristas) (Patent Baristas) (Patent Baristas) (Hal Wegner) (IP Updates) (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) US: Oral arguments completed in Tafas, GSK  v Dudas (Hal Wegner) (Patent Prospector) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) (PLI) (Patent Docs) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference:… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by John Elwood
The opinion has more references to Justice Roberts, the author of 1936’s United States v. [read post]