Search for: "State v. Secret" Results 2021 - 2040 of 7,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
" Should trial lawyer then tell the state's lawyer, when asked, that he had a good reason? [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:19 am by Cindy Cohn
Alternatively, they could state on the record that none of our clients' records were ever included in the NSA's telephone records collection, something that seems inconceivable (we do know what that word means) given that Jewel v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:24 am by Jasmine Joseph
There will be a run off election at this stage by secret ballot wherein the members of the nomination committee shall choose minimum two candidates who shall contest for the post of Chief Executive. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:33 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On August 23, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in Retailer Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:40 am
Rather than defend the indefensible, the Executive Branch moved to dismiss our suit on the basis of the “state secrets privilege ” - the very same defense that Alberto Gonzales ’s deputies have invoked to fend off the ACLU ’s challenges to illegal NSA eavesdropping and CIA kidnapping, and to silence FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 2:37 pm by Jonathan L. Israel
The parties and courts began working toward answers:  FaZe Clan moved to dismiss or stay the California state court action based on the New York forum selection clause. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Parker Higgins
A New York Times series on secretive corporate lobbying of state attorneys general has been awarded a Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting today. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Parker Higgins
A New York Times series on secretive corporate lobbying of state attorneys general has been awarded a Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting today. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
Appellees’ Brief Some highlights: “The merits of this case are not close—Florida may not commandeer private parties’ speech or require them to adopt the state’s preferred editorial choices….Florida made no secret that it enacted its unprecedented law to single out and punish certain online service providers for their perceived political viewpoints. [read post]