Search for: "State v. Sellers" Results 2021 - 2040 of 3,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
  And yet five Appeals Court justices could not agree on the meaning of that disclaimer (DeWolfe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
  The seller’s copy of a digital work would transfer to the buyer; the seller would no longer retain access to the work. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 3:39 pm
Ryan v London Borough of Islington [2009] EWCA Civ 578 concerned Ms Ryan’s Right to Buy under Part V Housing Act 1985 and whether or not it had been deemed to be withdrawn. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:59 am by Jack Goldsmith
Such transactions are “intangible” and often anonymous, and determined buyers and sellers could frequently circumvent regulations. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]